rific hires for her clients and I once asked her the secret of her suc-
cess. Helen replied, “Probably because I can almost always tell
when an applicant is lying.”
“How can you tell?”
She said, “Well, just last week, I was interviewing a young
woman for a position as marketing director for a small firm.
Throughout the interview, the applicant had been sitting with her
left leg crossed over her right. Her hands were comfortably rest-
ing in her lap and she was looking directly at me.
“I asked her salary. Without swerving her eyes from mine, she
told me. I asked if she enjoyed her work. Still looking directly at
me, she said, ‘yes.’ Then I asked her why she left her previous job.
“At that point, her eyes fleetingly darted away before regain-
ing eye contact with me.” Helen continued. “Then, while answer-
ing my question, she shifted in her seat and crossed her right leg
over her left. At one point, she put her hands up to her mouth.”
Helen said, “That’s all I needed. With her words she was
telling me she felt her ‘growth opportunities were limited at her
previous firm.’ But her body told me she was not being entirely
forthright.”
Helen went on to explain the young woman’s fidgeting alone
wouldn’t prove she was lying. Nevertheless, it was enough, she said,
that she wanted to pursue the subject further.
“So I tested it.” Helen explained. “I changed the subject and
went back to more neutral territory. I asked her about her goals
for the future. Again, the girl stopped fidgeting. She folded her
hands in her lap as she told me how she’d always wanted to work
in a small company in order to have hands-on experience with
more than one project.
“Then I repeated my earlier question. I asked again if it was
only the lack of growth opportunity that made her leave her pre-
vious position. Sure enough, once again, the woman shifted in her
seat and momentarily broke eye contact. As she continued talking
about her last job, she started rubbing her forearm.”
Helen continued to probe until she finally uncovered the
truth. The applicant had been fired because of a nasty disagree-
ment with the marketing director for whom she worked.
Human resources professionals who interview applicants and
police officers who interrogate suspected criminals are trained to
detect lies. They know specifically what signals to look for. The
rest of us, although not knowledgeable about specific clues to
deceit, have a sixth sense when someone is not telling us the truth.
Just recently a colleague of mine was considering hiring an in-
house booking agent. After interviewing one fellow she said to me,
“I don’t know. I don’t really think he has the success he claims.”
“You think he’s lying to you?” I asked.
“Absolutely. And the funny thing is I can’t tell why. He looked
right at me. He answered all my questions directly. There was just
something that didn’t seem right.”
Employers often feel this way. They have a gut feeling about
someone but they can’t put their finger on it. Because of that,
many large companies turn to the polygraph, or lie detector, a
mechanical apparatus designed to detect if someone is lying.
Banks, drugstores, and grocery stores rely heavily on it for pre-
employment screening. The FBI, Justice Department, and most
police departments have used the polygraph on suspects. Interest-
ingly, the polygraph is not a lie detector at all! All the machine can
do is detect fluctuations in our autonomic nervous system—
changes in breathing patterns, sweating, flushing, heart rate, blood
pressure, and other signs of emotional arousal.
So is it accurate? Well, yes, often it is. Why? Because when
the average person tells a lie, he or she is emotionally aroused and
bodily changes do take place. When that happens, the individual
might fidget. Experienced or trained liars, however, can fool the
polygraph.
Beware of the Appearance of Lying—
Even When You’re Telling the Truth
Problems arise for us when we are not lying but are feeling emo-
tional or intimidated by the person with whom we are talking. A
young man telling an attractive woman about his business success
might shift his weight. A woman talking about her company’s
track record to an important client could rub her neck.
More problems arise out of the atmosphere. A businessman
who doesn’t feel nervous at all could loosen his collar because the
room is hot. A politician giving a speech outdoors could blink
excessively because the air is dusty. Even though erroneous, these
fidgety movements give the listeners the sense something just isn’t
right or a gut feeling that the speaker is lying.
Professional communicators, alert to this hazard, consciously
squelch any signs anyone could mistake for shiftiness. They fix a
constant gaze on the listener. They never put their hands on their
faces. They don’t massage their arm when it tingles or rub their
nose when it itches. They don’t loosen their collar when it’s hot or
blink because it’s sandy. They don’t wipe away tiny perspiration
beads in public or shield their eyes from the sun. They suffer
because they know fidgeting undermines credibility. Consider the
infamous September 25, 1960, televised presidential debate
between Richard Milhous Nixon and John Fitzgerald Kennedy.
Political pundits speculate Nixon’s lack of makeup, his fidgeting,
and mopping his brow on camera lost him the election.
If you want to come across as an entirely credible Somebody,
try to squelch all extraneous movement when your communica-
tion counts. I call the technique “Limit the Fidget.”
Technique #7
Limit the Fidget
Whenever your conversation really counts, let your nose
itch, your ear tingle, or your foot prickle. Do not
fidget, twitch, wiggle, squirm, or scratch. And above
all, keep your paws away from your puss. Hand
motions near your face and all fidgeting can give your
listener the gut feeling you’re fibbing.
Now let’s tackle intelligence. “What?” you ask. “Can people
come across as more intelligent than they really are?” Well, did
you ever hear of Hans, the counting horse? Hans was considered
the most intelligent horse in history, and he used the technique
I’m about to suggest.
No comments:
Post a Comment